SANTA  ROSA  NEIGHBORHOOD  COALITION
  • HOME
    • Contact Us!
  • LAWSUIT AGAINST PLAN BAY AREA
    • PLAN BAY AREA
  • Watch SR Blog
  • VIDEO AND SMEAR
  • SRNC: Success
  • READ NOW
  • HUMBOLDT BIKE BLVD--FINAL
    • HUMBOLDT BIKE BLVD >
      • HUMBOLDT BIKE BLVD LETTERS
  • Green Building
    • Updates for Green Bldg Retrofit Plan
  • Sonoma County Energy Independence Boondoggle
  • Michael Allen & FPPC
    • DOCUMENTATION FOR FPPC COMPLAINT
    • Michael Allen and SCWA
    • Michael Allen: Comments
    • MICHAEL ALLEN: PLAGIARISM CHARGE
  • DELPHI
    • Delphi: What you can do
    • Santa Rosa Visions
  • Senator Wiggins Scandal
  • Juilliard Park
  • Rosa Koire & Kay Tokerud
    • Simon says Build Me A Parking Garage

Cyclist objects to propaganda and financing for Agenda 21

7/10/2012

1 Comment

 
We received a letter from a local Santa Rosa cyclist and have included it for you here.  We hope that this is evidence that Santa Rosans will not allow their clubs, groups, non-profits, or government to continue to indoctrinate them in UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development principles while using their own money to do it.  More and more clear-thinking Americans will join with this independent cyclist in refusing UN Agenda 21:

Landpaths will be speaking at the Santa Rosa Cycling club on Wednesday evening at the Round table Pizza on Occidental Road in Santa Rosa.

Below is my (the cyclist's) email to the board. Hope you or someone else informed can come to awaken some folks. Details below.

To many,

I for one will not attend tonight or supply any future dues to further this cause. Landpaths, although it sounds all wonderful and good is aligned with the Wildlands project and Sustainable Development which I DO NOT support. The implications go far beyond what your eyes seem to see.

I cannot support the club getting involved in politics

Maybe you folks just don't get it.

Here is a very brief, unbiased summary. Don't spend my dues on anything remotely political, please. I joined a bicycle club, not a COALITION.

from the Wildlands Project Revealed website
* The goal of the Wildlands Project is to set aside approximately fifty (50) percent of the North American continent (Turtle Island) as "wild land" for the preservation of biological diversity.
* The project seeks to do this by creating "reserve networks" across the continent. Reserves are made up of the following:
o Cores, created from public lands such as National Forest and Parks
o Buffers, often created from private land adjoining the cores to provide additional protection
o Corridors, a mix of public and private lands usually following along rivers and wildlife migration routes 
* The primary characteristics of core areas are that they are large (100,000 to 25 million acres), and allow for little, if any, human use.
* The primary characteristics of buffers are that they allow for limited human use so long as they are "managed with native biodiversity as a preeminent concern."
* Moral and ethical guidelines for the Wildlands Project are based on the philosophy of Deep Ecology.
* The eight point platform of Deep Ecology can be summarized as follows:
o All life (human and non-human) has equal value.
o Resource consumption above what is needed to supply "vital" human needs is immoral.
o Human population must be reduced
o Western civilization must radically change present economic, technological, and ideological structures.
o Believers have an obligation to try to implement the necessary changes. 
* The Wildlands Project itself is supported by hundreds of groups working towards its long-term implementation. Implementation may take 100 years or more.
* The Wildlands Project has received millions of dollars in support from wealthy private and corporate foundations such as the Turner Foundation, Patagonia, W. Alton Jones Foundation, Lyndhurst Foundation, etc. 

Conclusion:
The Wildlands Project exist within legal boundaries, however that should not prevent us from being concerned. At the very least, it advocates an extreme manifestation of environmental and public policy. Therefore, any claim the Wildlands Project makes toward public policy must be debated, and ultimately decided, in the public arena. Yet to date it has existed almost anonymously; beyond the knowledge of the wider public. It must be examined out from behind the cover of more general environmental concerns, held up for public scrutiny, and either accepted or rejected by a public fully aware of its implications. Failing to do so could have dire consequences, for as John Adams once wrote, "Liberty cannot be preserved without a general knowledge by the people."

July Club
Meeting
July 11 2012
The July club meeting is scheduled for 6:30 Wednesday evening at the Round Table Pizza on Occidental Rd, just west of Stony Point. There will be the usual round of business items and discussions of topics of importance to the club. 
This will be followed by a presentation by Craig Anderson, the Executive Director of LandPaths. LandPaths is one of the organizations that has been receiving support from SRCC's year-end donations. 
1 Comment

AND ANOTHER LOUSY TOWN HEARD FROM...

6/20/2012

1 Comment

 
For those of you who thought that Santa Rosa was the worst town in the US for propaganda, oppression, and manipulation, take a look at Cleveland, Tennessee.

I recently spoke in Cleveland, Tennessee about UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development and how redevelopment is a funding and implementation arm for Smart Growth: the ideology and preferred development style of A21.

I talked about making flyers and putting them on doorsteps to alert the town to what is happening.  

An anonymous citizen in Cleveland did just that.  The author of the flyer contacted me and said that everything in the flyer is true and fully documented. Take a look at this local newspaper article detailing the intimidation and attacks that are the result. This is an outrage.  That a mayor would call on the police to investigate and find out who the citizen is, shows just how frightened the government is of its free people.  WE SUPPORT THE PEOPLE OF CLEVELAND TENNESSEE.

Cleveland City Mayor Tom Rowland Calls For Investigation Of "Propaganda Flyer"Monday, June 18, 2012 - by Tonya Brantley

During the Cleveland City Council’s regular voting session meeting Monday afternoon, Mayor Tom Rowland addressed the council and audience concerning a flyer that was circulated to various residents throughout the city’s second district. 

The flyer, which Mayor Rowland referred to as propaganda, reads: “WARNING: If you live in the area of 18th Street SE between King Edward Avenue SE and Wildwood Avenue (south of the old Whirlpool site) – Your property rights may soon be violated if we don’t act now! 

"I am not a member of any political party and I am not asking you to join anything.
I am one citizen concerned about maintaining our way of life as Americans and stopping this madness that has taken over our local government. Please take 5 minutes to read this critical information, and you can decide what your next step will be. I do hope you will feel the need to get involved in some way. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me, A Concerned Citizen, at [email protected].

"The governments of Cleveland City, Bradley County and Charleston City, recently contracted with consultation group for $250,000, paid for by your tax dollars, to develop a plan called BCC 2035. This plan is based on the concepts of sustainable development, a managed growth plan for our area that is implemented through new land use regulations and restrictions. It incurs new public debt, and of course, increases our taxes. This plan is already in the implementation phase under the guise that the community supports it, even though you have never heard of it. How is this possible? They use a tactic called the Delphi Technique to manufacture consensus. In fact, the only persons who have bought into this plan are local politicians, the Chamber of Commerce, favored developers and environmental groups.

"Q. What does this mean to you as a resident or local business owner?

A. Your homes and businesses are targeted by this plan for demolition andredevelopment!! No Joke! I have the documentation to prove it! It’s called “Central City Area Plan – Themes White Paper with Draft Goals and Recommendations.” Call city Planner Greg Thomas or Rick Russell at BPR, who is the paid consultant for the plan,  and ask for a copy.

"Q. Why You?

A. Because you “do not pay a lot in property taxes” and have the infrastructure they need under your streets, your property is prime for redevelopment. I was told this to my face by the consultant himself, Rick Russell.

"Q. How can they do it?

A. The city, local housing authority, or appointed representatives, can use any of several tactics, including: citing your property as an eyesore or blight increasing code enforcement, and possibly using eminent domain to remove you from your property. You can Google “TN Code Annotated 13-20-201” to see the powers of the city or housing authority to act in regards to blight in the state of TN.

"Q.  How will they pay for all of this development?

A. This may be the worst part: You do! You will pay for a portion of your property taxes to repay bond debt incurred through a tool called Tax Increment Financing. Money will be diverted from our general fund to pay these debts that will be used to destroy you, all in the name of “creating jobs.”

"Q. What can you do?

A. Educate yourself about this! Google every one of the words or terms I have underlined in this document. Especially read the contents of BCC 2035. It is boring reading, so skip all the background and go to the recommendations. Your eyes will be opened! For more in depth reading I recommend you Google Redevelopment the Unknown Government. It gives an excellent understanding of the abuses of redevelopment. Tell your friends and neighbors. Feel free to copy and hand this out. Call your local representatives, city and county planners, Rick Russell at BPR, and make them explain why they think your home(s) should be demolished!!”

Mayor Rowland said, “This flyer was anonymously passed out in the city. It’s my understanding that over 20 people contacted Greg Thomas because his number was listed on the flyer, who were concerned and some even expressed fear that we’re going to take their property. Nothing can be further from the truth. I think this flyer is very exciting. I don’t find anything, maybe some terminology here and there that’s even true. As you know, we’ve informed the Southside Redevelopment District to increase property values in that area to get rid of the blighted piece of our city to enhance the value of the property around it. I don’t know who the favored developers are, I’ve never seen any. I’ve asked the question about public hearings. Numerous public hearings have been held, not only in the BCC 2035 Plan, but in this venue as well and the county commission. The public has had plenty of time to hear comments on this issue.

"First of all, if local politicians are brought into it, that’s the American way. These are people elected by the people. Nothing is going to happen without elected officials acting on behalf of the people. How will they pay for this new development? I don’t know what new development they’re talking about. We do know that we don’t want the old Whirlpool factory to become a blighted part of our community and devalue property in the area. We don’t want that to happen. That’s why we formed this Southside Development Committee.”

Mayor Rowland went on to say, “My concern is this. The 20-plus families that called who were fearful of the propaganda in this flyer are upset because of this. I’m upset that somebody who is anonymous thinks they have a right to spread untruths to the citizens in our community. To tell them things, and put fear into their minds that are not true, things very unlikely to happen. I this is some sort of tactic to scare people.

"We do want to get rid of eyesores and blight and that’s what we intend to do with the old Whirlpool property. I think this is a very cruel hoax on the citizens of our community to put this flyer in their doors. This is sneaky and at its very best deceiving. Whoever wrote this should be exposed. I’m going to ask the council for a vote to ask police chief, city attorney and the district attorney’s office to do a full investigation on this matter and determine if any laws were broken and try to uncover source of this flyer.”

Councilman David May made the motion which passed unanimously.
 
1 Comment

TOWNS ARE FIGHTING BACK

6/6/2012

0 Comments

 
Hi Rosa:

Here in Great Falls, MT last night we defeated a proposal to adopt the "Complete Streets" idiocy package. I feel that your website was instrumental in giving us the ammunition that we needed to do the job. Thanks!!!

Mike Lewis

PS:
I graduated from Santa Rosa High so I know that town pretty good. 

http://www.greatfallstribune.com/
0 Comments

Got Gas?

6/3/2012

0 Comments

 
Take a look at the Climate Action Plan about to be passed by the Santa Rosa City Council on Tuesday, June 5.

We dare you.

One thing you'll find is that you'll be 'incentivized' to get rid of your gas appliances and 'switch' to electric.  Here's what Kay Tokerud had to say about it in the Santa Rosa PD blog:
I read through Santa Rosa’s Climate Action Plan that goes before the city council at their next meeting. What jumped out at me was a recommendation and/or mandate that all gas appliances be changed to electrical appliances. That would include cook stoves, furnaces, dryers and water heaters. This one piece of their plan could run households or businesses thousands of dollars to make this change including the necessary electrical service changes which would be required whenever anything electrical is added to an existing system. This could easily add up to over ten thousand dollars.
This plan has Electrical Unions written all over it. Electricians would get a lot of work. Only in Sonoma County/Santa Rosa would the government try to force people to do very expensive changes to switch to a much more costly fuel to power their homes. Michael Allen received the maximum amount allowable from every electrical union in California in his last race for Assembly. This requirement has Michael Allen written all over it.  He ought to make this a campaign disclosure now that he's running again... he should keep running over the state line.

And to top things off, this recommendation is coming at the same time that Sonoma County wants to set up their own green power company. Natural gas is very plentiful, cheap and clean burning. It’s unbelievable the amount of contempt that our elected officials appear to have for their constituents when they would try to make us switch to a much more expensive power source for our homes and businesses.

Michael Allen has been lobbying for mandates for a few years now, first it was mandatory inspections and retrofits for Santa Rosa  (our group successfully pushed back on this), then he was involved in another bill, SB730 when he worked for State Senator Pat Wiggins that failed that would have essentially forced every building owner to put in solar hot water, and now he’s very likely involved in this climate action plan in some way.

Michael Allen is a union rep and will represent his unions over the general public every time. Maybe it’s time to investigate his activities again. The last time he ended up paying a fine to the Fair Political Practices Commission for serious conflicts of interest. Why would anyone want to vote for him?  Will you?

VOICE YOUR CONCERNS ABOUT THE Climate Action Plan -- GO TO THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING.  TUESDAY JUNE 5.  4 PM.  BE THERE.  SPEAK OUT.

0 Comments

If it walks like a chicken...

5/27/2012

2 Comments

 
Chick-fil-A wanted to open a store in Santa Rosa across from the Junior College.  A drive-thru.   They're even planning to build a brand new building.  Where?  At the site of an old Burger King that has been vacant and pushing up weeds for a few years.  Owned by the bank since one of the town's big real estate guys went belly up.

So?  So, Jenny Bard, the Junior College Neighborhood Association president (again--she's like Vladimir Putin, she keeps coming back) objected to Chick-fil-A opening a drive-thru where there had been one before. 

Why?  Because she's a paid lobbyist for Smart Growth.  She's working for the Californina Lung Association as their 'advocate' for Smart Growth.  People in the neighborhood don't know that, however.  In fact they don't know much of anything because she only sends emails to people who agree with her, according to those who tell us they've been kicked off the neighborhood association email lists for not going along.

Anyway, Chick-fil-A has a business model that includes a drive-thru.  But Jenny, the Smart Growth advocate, thinks that drive-thrus are bad because they encourage people to use their cars.  Hmmm, maybe a bike thru?  She didn't think of that.  So objections were raised to the Planning Commission from 'the neighborhood' and Chick-fil-A didn't get their approvals.  They had to appeal to the City Council.

Wonder how much time and money that cost them?

Business-friendly Santa Rosa finally said ok.  They didn't lay an egg on that one.  Jenny has a car.  So does Susan Gorin.  So does Marsha Vas Dupre.  They both voted against Chick-fil-A (they're on the council).  Susan is grandstanding since she is running for county supervisor.  She's the 'Sierra Club's Choice."    

The Santa Rosa Press Democrat wrote a story on Chick-fil-A at Council and, even though Kay Tokerud, Steering Committee member of the Santa Rosa Neighborhood Coalition, attended the Council meeting and spoke in favor of Chick-fil-A's appeal, the newspaper misrepresented the proceedings and said that the neighborhood was against it.  We'll have the video of the meeting for you soon.  

What a town.  Full of feathers, signifying nothing.
2 Comments

Who cares what it costs?

5/1/2012

0 Comments

 
On April 10 the Sonoma County Water Agency voted unanimously to take the next steps toward Sonoma Clean Power, a local program that buys and generates electricity for business and residents. The Board voted to pursue the creation of a Joint Powers Authority that would govern the program, and to produce the program’s Implementation Plan laying out the details of how Sonoma Clean Power will work. Once complete, the Implementation Plan will be submitted to the California Public Utilities Commission to establish Sonoma Clean Power as a local electricity provider. 


Yes, that's right.  Sonoma County Water Agency, the same agency that has raised your water bills through the roof over the last 3 years, will be in the business of 'buying and generating power.'    No limit to what they can charge you.

This is UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development.
0 Comments

It's everywhere. Alaska to Florida, Maine to Hawaii

4/24/2012

1 Comment

 

A letter we just received:
I am president of the Eastside Pioneers Neighborhood Association in Rochester MN. I have been reading over your website regarding your struggles with Agenda 21 driven initiatives. We are having the same problems. We have been at the receiving end of the Delphi technique and are also experiencing their current efforts to deal with an upstart organization objecting to their agenda. Right now Agenda 21 proponents are trying to pass some crazy and confusing parking and zoning restrictions that would coincide with their downtown master plan. The city and county plans are riddled with plans to increase the densities in the downtown area, including downtown neighborhoods, which we are one. They also want to restrict car use, narrow the roads, increase dependence on mass transit and create more livable walkable communities. They are placing a heavy emphasis on bicycling and pouring money into bicycle trails and bridges. Social engineering to the max. We are in Minnesota. Usually we are covered with snow and ice late October through March. These Agenda 21 people are idiots. Anyway your website has a lot of good information. I appreciate it Thank you very much. We could use all the help we can get. I will stay in touch if it is okay 
1 Comment

IT'S BACK --- We don't gotta show you no stinkin badges

3/21/2012

0 Comments

 
What is it with this vampire of a town?  We thought we killed mandatory green building retrofits.  THEY'RE BACK.  

I hope you like living in Sonoma County's version of Invasion of the Body Snatchers---look around, are your neighbors willing to have you be subjected to illegal search just so someone can see if you have insulation in your attic?  Better get your comments in to the City Council.  Do it now.  It's the resurrection of the old vampire.

Read about it here 
0 Comments

ONE BAY AREA: BAY OF TRICKS

2/15/2012

0 Comments

 
ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS ATTEMPTS TO MEET SECRETLY WITH ACTIVISTS
If you've been following our actions at the ONE BAY AREA meetings with other groups, including East Bay Tea Party, 9-12 groups, property rights groups, and other Tea Parties, you know that we have deeply upset the game the Government (Association of Bay Area Governments--ABAG, and Metropolitan Transportation Commission--MTC in league with their public/private partners, Silicon Valley Partnership and Greenbelt Alliance) is playing.  The Delphi game is to pretend, and get you to believe, that your input is solicited to craft the plan when in fact it is already set up before you show up.  This is a Regional Plan, a stepping stone to Mega Regions and then to Global Government.  We haven't been going along to get along.


So out of the hundreds of people who attended their 'workshops,' in the 9 county Bay Area, out of the 7.5 million people in the Bay Area who would have questions about this plan if they knew about it, just four of us have been invited to a private meeting with ABAG-MTC.

Who are we?  Heather Gass, East Bay Tea Party Leader; Mimi Steel, 9-12 Leader; Carol Tomlinson, Tea Party Leader; and me.

Here's the email they sent:
Ms. Koire:
 
The Executive Directors of MTC and ABAG are extending an invitation to meet with them at the MetroCenter to discuss issues and matters brought up at the Winter 2012 PlanBayArea workshops. There are three possible meeting times - one will be selected based on availability of invitees. Please reply to accept the invitation and indicate your preferred meeting date.
 
Thursday, Feb 16, between 1:00 pm and 2:00 pm
Friday, Feb 17, between 3:00 pm and 5:00 pm
Friday, 3/2/12, between 9:00 am 11:00 am
 
regards,
JoAnna Bullock
Senior Grant Administrator, Urban Planner
 
JoAnna Bullock [email protected] 
 
Association of Bay Area Governments
MetroCenter 101 Eighth Street
Oakland, CA  94607
       
  
I had been checking into the American Planning Association propaganda and saw that they have now put out a seminar on how to handle us.  That's you and me. So this is what I sent back:
 
You must have gotten this guide from the APA.

"Preparation
Second, be proactive
 Reach out to groups likely to oppose
 Request a meeting with them to listen to 
concerns and ideas
 Do not try to change their minds –collect 
their input
 Encourage them to provide you with 
materials (books, websites, etc.)

 Research local activist networks"


But Heather wanted to get more information.  I'm glad she did.  Here's her exchange:
Ms. Bullock,

I have several questions about this invitation that need to be cleared up before I consider attending.  Will this be a publicly noticed meeting subject the Brown Act and open to the public, Executive Session or an informal (private) meeting not subject to the Brown Act?  Who are the invitees? Is this open to the public or to just a handful of people? Which MTC/ABAG Executive Directors will be in attendance? Also, I am unclear as to the purpose of this meeting? What “Issues and Matters” will be discussed. I would like an agenda for the meeting.

Heather Gass

 -------------
Ms. Gass,
 
This is a invitation to meet informally with the executive director of MTC, Steve Hemminger and the executive director of ABAG, Ezra Rapport. The invitation was extended to the following attendees of the PBA public workshops:
Carol Thomlison
Rosa Koire
Mimi Steele
This will be an informal meeting, not a public meeting - no elected officials will be present so it is not subject to the Brown Act. The purpose of the meeting is to provide an opportunity to those that expressed issues and dissent at the PBA workshops to speak directly with the executive directors. The executive directors prefer no agenda - this is opportunity for open dialogue.
 
regards,
JoAnna Bullock
Senior Grant Administrator, Urban Planner



How bout that, folks?  Now they want an 'open dialogue' outside of the eyes and ears of the public and for the sole purpose of finding out about us.
      FORGET ABOUT IT.  
      NO GOOD GERMANS.
0 Comments

ONE BAY AREA, ONE REGION, ONE GLOBAL DICTATORSHIP?

1/24/2012

1 Comment

 
PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO YOUR EMAIL LISTS--It's important.

THIS IS WHAT A REVOLUTION LOOKS LIKE

You are witnessing a plan that is being implemented all across the United States NOW.  It has many names but it's the same plan. UN AGENDA 21/SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: Sustainable  Cities Strategy. It is a regional plan that creates unelected boards of elected officials who are engaged in erasing the boundaries between cities, counties, and states.  You are losing your ability to influence your government policies at the same time that you are being solicited for your opinion. It's a tactic to silence you. This is the Delphi method of manipulating groups and controlling populations that may protest. By 2050, or sooner, there will be 11 Mega-Regions in the United States that include parts of Mexico and Canada.  This is not a delusional rant.  This is a fact.  Go to www.America2050.org 

What are these plans called?  Your government is using similar names for all of these plans and they are all the same: Regional.  They are being rolled out NOW.  The adoption date is MID-2013.  ALL OVER THE US.  Most of us are unaware that the plan we are fighting is the same plan, with minor variations, being imposed in the name of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, expanding public transportation, and funding low-income housing.  All plans include Smart Growth--high density housing with restrictions on personal space and car usage.  All plans support high speed trains--the building block of Mega-Regions.  All plans give power to regional transportation and planning boards (MPOs and COGs) through federal and state fund disbursements.  In all plans housing and transportation are now linked.  In all plans population projections are hugely inflated.  All plans will go forward as planned regardless of your input.  This is a planning revolution.

Here are just a few places around the country using the word "VISION" a UN Agenda 21 buzz word.  There are many others with similar names using the sustainability jargon. These are just a few of the thousands in the US and around the world (for example, the Hanoi Center Regional Plan is exactly the same)
  • One Valley One Vision (you'll find this in Santa Clarita Valley, CA; Montana; and Dona Ana County/Las Cruces New Mexico
  • Nine Counties, One Vision (Tennessee)
  • One Region One Vision (New York, Indiana)
  • Our Florida Our Vision
  • One Bay Area (SF Bay Area--9 counties)
  • Six Towns One Vision (Lycoming County)
  • Five Counties One Vision (Minnesota)
  • Four States One Vision (Oklahoma, Arkansas, Missouri, Kansas)
We need to use civil disobedience.  Refuse to accept these plans.  They are not YOUR plan.  They are destroying your cities.  This is UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development.  Educate yourself and others.  This is war.  Join us at Democrats Against UN Agenda 21 in fighting for our freedom. 

Not on our watch.  
Awareness is the first step in the Resistance.  
Action is the second step.


  • DEMAND THAT SANTA ROSA TERMINATE ITS MEMBERSHIP IN ICLEI--International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives
1 Comment
<<Previous
Forward>>

    Eyes on Santa Rosa

    Calling it as we see it

    Archives

    May 2017
    May 2016
    September 2015
    July 2015
    June 2014
    May 2014
    March 2014
    November 2013
    October 2013
    August 2013
    May 2013
    April 2013
    February 2013
    January 2013
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    August 2012
    July 2012
    June 2012
    May 2012
    April 2012
    March 2012
    February 2012
    January 2012
    December 2011
    November 2011
    October 2011
    August 2011
    July 2011
    June 2011
    May 2011
    March 2011
    February 2011
    January 2011
    December 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010

    Categories

    All
    Accountable Development Coalition
    Communitarianism
    Iclei
    Michael Allen
    Neighborhood Associations
    Neighborhood Information
    One Bay Area
    Redevelopment
    Smart Growth
    Smart Train
    Unions

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.